a minimum house for leisure at the XXI century

Opening of the exhibition and Book presentation by the authors:
"SUSTAINABLE DESIGN: towards a new ethic in archtecture and town planning." By Marie-Helene Contal and Jana Revedin

18th June 2009 17:30 h
at the EnergieDesign-Center Berlin (Friedrichstr. 136)

Registration is recommended, due to capacity of the place, under: edc-berlin@systaic.com

"Living 2015" - Solar Decathlon Winner 2007

"1st prize in the international "Solar Decathlon 2007" competition to find the most attractive and energy-efficient solar home in 2007 went to Germany. The competition rules require a fully energy-independent building with a floor area limited to 75 m². The prototype is laden with new technologies and concepts: Vacuum insulation (VIP), thermo-active building systems using phase change materials (PCM), solar power generation (PV) integrated into the facade and roof and many other features ensure energy autonomy. The team from the Technical University in Darmstadt, headed by Prof. Manfred Hegger, triumphed in Washington D.C. against 19 other top universities from the USA, Canada and Spain. This high-tech building will be erected as a project office on the "Lichtwiese" campus at TU Darmstadt, serving as an EnBau model project for detailed testing and optimisation in everyday use."

http://www.enob.info/en/new-buildings/project/details/solar-decathlon-winner-living-2015-prototype/






Ingrid Pohl of BuroHappold for Summer Academy

On Tuesday, 12th May 2009 the international urban and landscape architectural competition for the Columbia Quartier along the boundary of the vacant Airport of Tempelhof was decided.
After a first round with 80 proposals, in December 2008 only 12 projects were chosen for the second phase of the competition. Three of them received the final prize as follows:

# Graft Architekten / Büro Kiefer Landschaftsarchitektur, (Berlin)
# Urban essences Architektur / Lützow 7 Landschaftsarchitektur, (Berlin)
# chora architecture (London)/ gross.max Landschaftsarchitektur (Edinburg)

The Team of chora architecture/gross.max combining architects and landscape architects developed an energetic, sustainable and infrastructural concept, together with Buro Happold from Berlin.

This team conceived Tempelhof as collective public space and alternative Energy plant, the Air Bridge to the Future:











“The Airport of Tempelhof has the function of a bridge, like the future of our cities can reflect. Cities, which consist not only of energetically passive structures, but also of active energy producers networked with intelligent systems.

A ring surrounding the central park should give a new form to the landscape, a place, where Technology and Nature melt themselves, where Energy should be produced out of different technologies and where a field for learning, experimenting and researching may be developed.

Along this ring, different quarters regarding an IBA (International Building Exhibition) should be raised. The nucleus of our proposal is the development of a Management instrument allowing diverse companies and dwellers coexist through a sustainable financial process. This instrument may also achieve the possibility of coordinating resources to meet decisions aiming an ambitious objective: Tempelhof as an Energy producer, taking care of the surrounding neighbourhoods, bringing people together and radically reducing carbon emissions, as the Government requires.”

Lucius Rathke for the Summer Academy

SUSTAINABILITY AND ARCHITECTURE

Although energy-saving buildings can now be built from largely recyclable building materials, this has not yet led to a new form of architectural expression, so the question is raised whether there is any connection at all between sustainability and drafts or designs.
In addition, there is also the question whether buildings with clearly recognisable energy-saving designs can be more easily marketed than energy-saving buildings without special design?
If we consider the market for consumer goods, we see that technical developments are most swiftly reflected in new product designs for products which are sold on a large scale worldwide. Here, the design frequently shows the product’s new characteristics on the one hand, but also follows the corporate design of the brand or product family on the other hand.
The apparent high quality of technical products is increasingly obscure to the consumer (how, for example, can we distinguish one computer chip from another?). For this reason, consumers tend to rely on brand name products. Likewise, customers buying a brand name product trust that the product will suit them and their conception of themselves (and they are therefore part of the target group).
If we look for similar characteristics/correlations between the consumer goods market and the real estate market, the concepts of product image, brand and mobility are particularly interesting.

1. MOBILITY/IMMOBILITY versus BRAND NAME ?

Mobility/Immobility

Mobile telephones and cars work equally well wherever they are. Their design can and must therefore be independent of any local influences and references, and thereby appeals to the broadest possible global target groups. Differentiation between designs and target groups therefore takes place according to criteria such as, for example, gender, age, income, etc.
By contrast, good architecture/the design of buildings makes reference to the locality (genius loci). Adult men and women are potential purchasers or tenants of buildings in equal measure. Architecture which, for instance, only addresses women or young people would therefore be extremely difficult to market.
For this reason, the shape and form of buildings are determined according to completely different principles than for mobile, fast-moving mass consumer goods.

2. BRAND = DEVELOPMENT

In addition to design and/or packaging with a high degree of recognition, brand name products are characterised by their quality, which in the best case scenario is based on long-term research and development. Irrespective of packaging design, the customer, for example, expects the detergent Persil to represent the culmination of the entire experience of the Henkel Group.
Buildings in their entirety are not mass-produced goods. At most, mass-produced goods are installed into them (e.g. sanitary ware, lighting, etc.). Whilst these display the characteristics of brand name products, they do not define the architecture.
Buildings are usually constructed as unique, individual creations and are therefore always prototypes which cannot be the result of long development studies either from a financial or a time point of view.
The situation is only different for prefabricated buildings, which are mass-produced and designed to appeal to specific target groups by the use of conventional architectural clichés (bay windows, windows with glazing bars, fireplaces, pantile roofs). In the cutthroat market of the different prefabricated homes manufacturers, this means the establishment of brand names and images. Huf-Haus projects the brand name image of a company producing high-quality, energy-saving prefabricated houses using plenty of glass and wood, and received praise for this with the reddot design award in 2009.

3. IMAGE = Message

Everywhere where actual or assumed qualities of a product are not visible, i.e. cannot be shown through the design characteristics of the product, product image is necessary or helpful in emphasising the product characteristics and the single defining features (unique selling points).
Today, most consumers are hardly in a position to distinguish between a diesel and a petrol engine or judge the performance of different computers by their appearance. Even fewer are able to judge by the appearance of a building whether it is energy-saving or not. At best, visible indications include photovoltaic conversion equipment or solar energy facilities on house roofs.

4. AIMS

Consequently, the following primary aims initially crystallise for the design and communication of sustainable architecture:
- Improvement of the recognition of all technical constructions and facilities which each contribute to sustainability;
- Improvement of the recognition of the unique design characteristics and special features, including, for example, climatic zones within the buildings, etc.
In addition, it is necessary to always develop sustainable buildings in close cooperation with their intended purpose, i.e.:
- Sustainable architecture must offer new advantages of a sustainable lifestyle to its users;
- Traditional – in particular urban – forms of lifestyle must be fundamentally reconsidered and questioned in the form of visionary scenarios;
- New architectural developments must be a response to different user behaviour patterns in future.

invitation

The 4th Edition of the Summer Academy Berlin will be launched in a few days. You are invited to the Opening on 2nd June at 15:00. The event will be held inside the Küchenmonument (Kitchenmonument) designed by Raumlabor and PlastiqueFantastique in front of Haus Bauwesen at Beuth Hochschule der Technik (Luxemburger Str. corner with Tegler Weg).

http://www.kuechenmonument.de/

























Once Mara Pinardi opens the international Summer Academy, the following conferences will be held:
L: prof. robert demel/ low carbon lifestyle environment
http://www.summer-academy-berlin.eu
L: markus bader, raumlabor/ bottom up top down
http://www.raumlabor-berlin.de
L: dr. michael lafond, experiment city/ planning participation
http://www.experimentcity.net/

L: prof. rolo fütterer, belval-ouest/ house urban fabric image
http://www.jocoenen.com/fl/e/index_content_small.htm

L: ingrid pohl, masterplaning sustainable/ performance design
http://www.burohappold.com/BH/Home.aspx

L: dietmar bartholome, competition results
http://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de/planen/staedtebau-projekte/tempelhof/de/zukunft/index.shtml

Four years ago, as we started with the idea of realising a summer academy concerning sustainable building, it was seen as an innovative proposal. In between, some other relevant Technical Colleges such as the ETH, the University of Wuppertal or Stuttgart have also established summer programs about Energy efficiency.

I am glad that the profile of the Summer Academy of the BHT has been more and more accurate along these four years. It is general knowledge that we are going to build energetic high efficient constructions in the near future, and a mere look into technical press is enough to realize about the importance of the subject in current discourse. The main potential, which is offered here, is whether the strategic environment should only combine nature, construction and technical devices, or whether this new way of building implies a further brand-new aesthetic. The Summer Academy is dealing with such questions this year.

The initial event will go into urban and architectural models regarding the background of the expected climate change. It is predicted that Berlin will have similar conditions in 2050 to current Milan and in 2100 similar to current North Spain or Rome. (Prof. W. Endlicher HU Berlin)

A new Climate IBA (International Building Exhibition) is being discussed for the vacant airport of Tempelhof. Consequently, I consider that would end into the complete construction of the site in 10 or 15 years. By that time, building regulations will be developed so far, that the energetic standards for new constructions might be very near to those of passive houses today, or even more advanced. These standards are based on an avoidance strategy, which also makes sense.

On one hand the question is to which extent it affects the city and its houses. As reference we can find the resulting projects of the Columbia Quartier competition. On the other hand, which influence has climate change to the role of the city? What does a Southern European city look like today? How does public space work? How can climate enrich and condition architecture is another question to which the projects on Columbia Quartier tried to find a response.

I would really appreciate your assistance.
Prof. Robert Demel

building as total system

An innovative concept on the principle of 'saving energy rather than paying to generating it' has resulted in a 'zero-energy building' for Eawag and Empa in Dübendorf: a model of sustainability in action, awarded by the World Sustainable Building Conference. The orientation, massing, envelope, storage mass and solar protection of the office building were optimised so as to avoid the need for a conventional heating system. The building's heating needs are met by using geothermal storage, solar energy and the heat energy produced inside the building by its occupants, computers and lighting.

The rooms are organised into various functional zones, grouped around a five-storey atrium. Cantilevered conference pods, the main staircase and views linking one part with another turn the atrium into a spatial experience. The spaces along the outer walls can be divided flexibly to enable new ways of working and freely networked workplaces. Seminar rooms, a lecture theatre and a staff restaurant broaden the wide variety of rooms provided.

http://www.bgp.ch/English/PR.asp?ID_UT=5&ID=1&FID=1&Offset=2

http://www.sb08.org/
www.forumchriesbach.eawag.ch/dokumente/Eawag_05514.pdf

dancing & kinetic energy

Club Watt features a LED-laden dance floor that is lit up solely by the kinetic energy generated by dancers. The new nightclub will also feature a variety of efficiency standards established by the Sustainable Dance Club group that allow it to save 30% on energy consumption, 50% on water use, cut CO2 emissions by 30%, and reduce waste by 50%.
Home to a thriving young, creative, and diverse population, Rotterdam is the ideal location for Watt. The new club functions as an iconic representation of what the Sustainable Dance Club group is trying to replicate in nightclubs and festivals around the world: an environmentally aware, interactive, sustainable experience.

Watt features a variety of sustainable strategies that include the use of energy-efficient LED lighting instead of powerhungry spotlights, a rainwater catchment’s system that supplies water for its toilets, and waterless urinals which will save an expected 1000 cubic meters of water per year. The club’s LED laden dance floor converts each dancer’s kinetic energy into 20W, allowing it to power itself. These features put the club well on its way to reaching the 50% decrease in CO2 emissions mandated by the Rotterdam Climate Initiative...

http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/10/02/sustainable-dance-club-opens-in-rotterdam/
http://www.sustainabledanceclub.com/index.php?t=txt&tx=3